According to Borislav Bereza, a member of the Ukrainian Parliament, the commission led by fellow MP Vitaliy Bezgin is seeking to justify its existence and secure funding for another six months of «sweet life». This statement has caused quite a stir in the Ukrainian political landscape, with many questioning the motives and actions of the commission.
The commission, officially known as the Temporary Investigative Commission on the Protection of National Interests in the Sphere of Gas Supply and Transit, was formed in October 2019 to investigate the controversial gas deals between Ukraine and Russia. The commission was given a six-month mandate, which is set to expire in April 2020. However, according to Bereza, the commission is now seeking to extend its mandate and secure funding for another six months.
Bereza, who is not a member of the commission, has accused Bezgin and his team of using the commission as a means to secure personal gain. In a recent interview, he stated that the commission has not produced any significant results and is now trying to justify its existence by extending its mandate and securing funding for another six months. He also claimed that the commission has spent a significant amount of money on luxurious trips and accommodations, dubbing it a «sweet life» for its members.
These accusations have sparked a heated debate in the Ukrainian political scene, with many questioning the effectiveness and transparency of the commission. Some have even called for the commission to be disbanded, citing its lack of results and alleged misuse of funds.
In response to these accusations, Bezgin has defended the commission, stating that they have been working diligently to investigate the gas deals and have made significant progress. He also denied the allegations of misusing funds, stating that all expenses were approved by the commission and were necessary for their work.
Despite the back and forth between Bereza and Bezgin, one thing is clear – the commission’s mandate is set to expire in April and a decision must be made on its future. The commission has faced criticism from both sides of the political spectrum, with some accusing it of being a political tool and others questioning its effectiveness.
However, it is important to note that the commission was formed with the intention of investigating a crucial issue for Ukraine – the gas deals with Russia. These deals have had a significant impact on the country’s economy and national security, and it is important to have a thorough and unbiased investigation.
While the accusations of personal gain and misuse of funds are concerning, it is also important to give the commission the opportunity to complete its investigation and present its findings. If the commission is disbanded prematurely, it could hinder the progress made so far and leave many questions unanswered.
In conclusion, the statement made by Borislav Bereza has shed light on the ongoing debate surrounding the commission led by Vitaliy Bezgin. While the accusations of personal gain and misuse of funds are serious, it is important to remember the commission’s original purpose – to investigate the gas deals between Ukraine and Russia. As the commission’s mandate comes to an end, it is crucial for all parties involved to put aside personal interests and focus on finding the truth for the sake of the country.
